:
pp string.split.permutation.to_a
[["Ruby", "web", "framework"],
["Ruby", "framework", "web"],
["web", "Ruby", "framework"],
["web", "framework", "Ruby"],
["framework", "Ruby", "web"],
["framework", "web", "Ruby"]]
ため息... OK ...ここで私はそれを行うだろうかです:
require 'pp'
string = "Ruby web framework"
strings_to_search = string.split.permutation.map{ |p| 'Lorem, ' + p.join(' ') + ' consectetur'}
strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby consectetur'
strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby web consectetur'
strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby Ruby Ruby'
pp strings_to_search.map{ |p| p.scan(Regexp.union(string.split)) }
そして、何が起こっているのか:
1.9.2-p290 :001 > require 'pp'
true
1.9.2-p290 :002 >
1.9.2-p290 :003 > string = "Ruby web framework"
"Ruby web framework"
1.9.2-p290 :004 > strings_to_search = string.split.permutation.map{ |p| 'Lorem, ' + p.join(' ') + ' consectetur'}
[
[0] "Lorem, Ruby web framework consectetur",
[1] "Lorem, Ruby framework web consectetur",
[2] "Lorem, web Ruby framework consectetur",
[3] "Lorem, web framework Ruby consectetur",
[4] "Lorem, framework Ruby web consectetur",
[5] "Lorem, framework web Ruby consectetur"
]
1.9.2-p290 :005 >
1.9.2-p290 :006 > strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby consectetur'
[
[0] "Lorem, Ruby web framework consectetur",
[1] "Lorem, Ruby framework web consectetur",
[2] "Lorem, web Ruby framework consectetur",
[3] "Lorem, web framework Ruby consectetur",
[4] "Lorem, framework Ruby web consectetur",
[5] "Lorem, framework web Ruby consectetur",
[6] "Lorem, Ruby consectetur"
]
1.9.2-p290 :007 > strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby web consectetur'
[
[0] "Lorem, Ruby web framework consectetur",
[1] "Lorem, Ruby framework web consectetur",
[2] "Lorem, web Ruby framework consectetur",
[3] "Lorem, web framework Ruby consectetur",
[4] "Lorem, framework Ruby web consectetur",
[5] "Lorem, framework web Ruby consectetur",
[6] "Lorem, Ruby consectetur",
[7] "Lorem, Ruby web consectetur"
]
1.9.2-p290 :008 > strings_to_search << 'Lorem, Ruby Ruby Ruby'
[
[0] "Lorem, Ruby web framework consectetur",
[1] "Lorem, Ruby framework web consectetur",
[2] "Lorem, web Ruby framework consectetur",
[3] "Lorem, web framework Ruby consectetur",
[4] "Lorem, framework Ruby web consectetur",
[5] "Lorem, framework web Ruby consectetur",
[6] "Lorem, Ruby consectetur",
[7] "Lorem, Ruby web consectetur",
[8] "Lorem, Ruby Ruby Ruby"
]
1.9.2-p290 :009 >
1.9.2-p290 :010 > pp strings_to_search.map{ |p| p.scan(Regexp.union(string.split)) }
[["Ruby", "web", "framework"],
["Ruby", "framework", "web"],
["web", "Ruby", "framework"],
["web", "framework", "Ruby"],
["framework", "Ruby", "web"],
["framework", "web", "Ruby"],
["Ruby"],
["Ruby", "web"],
["Ruby", "Ruby", "Ruby"]]
[
[0] [
[0] "Ruby",
[1] "web",
[2] "framework"
],
[1] [
[0] "Ruby",
[1] "framework",
[2] "web"
],
[2] [
[0] "web",
[1] "Ruby",
[2] "framework"
],
[3] [
[0] "web",
[1] "framework",
[2] "Ruby"
],
[4] [
[0] "framework",
[1] "Ruby",
[2] "web"
],
[5] [
[0] "framework",
[1] "web",
[2] "Ruby"
],
[6] [
[0] "Ruby"
],
[7] [
[0] "Ruby",
[1] "web"
],
[8] [
[0] "Ruby",
[1] "Ruby",
[2] "Ruby"
]
]
あなたが持ったらヒット、THENあなたは受け入れてはいけないものを除外します。あなたがあまりにも扱いにくくなり、メンテナンスの悪夢となるパターンを作るので、正規表現でそれをすべてやろうとしないでください。
私は100%があなたの究極の問題文が最良の正規表現で解決されて確信していません。また、置換が*すべての*単語を含んでいなければならないと述べていません。もしそうなら、3つの '[foo | bar | baz] +'節が十分にあるでしょう。しかし、これは本当に最終目標ですか?または、ファジーテキストの検索/マッチングを試みていますか? –
この正規表現は 'ruby ruby ruby'や他の順列にマッチするはずですか? –
@Dave Newton:順列はすべての単語を含むものから順に並べる必要があります。 「ルビールビールビーは、」一致(またはより良いべきではない、彼らは言葉だけだったと一致する必要があります:最終resoultはただ一つの単語 –